Watchmen movie reviewed
So I’ve just come back from a midnight viewing of the Watchmen. I sat through 2 hours and 40 minutes wondering why the film couldn’t be a little shorter. It doesn’t mean I didn’t like the film; I did. However, as someone who isn’t familiar with the original work, the plot was complicated and somewhat overwhelming. It’s the same sort of feeling that you get when you’re offered an extremely expensive and well regarded red wine. You sip it, it swirls around your mouth and you feel somewhat badly that you aren’t immediately impressed by it. You want to like it more, but your own inexperience lets you down.
The film is visually striking no doubt; its look and style catches your attention. It’s immediately immersive, easily persuading you that you’re in an alternate America where it’s still 1985, Nixon has been re-elected five times and the Cold War is plunging the world to the brink annihilation.

The Comedian's past reveals a complex anti-hero who's almost as much villain as he is hero.
The opening montage and the scene where you witness the murder of the Comedian are well done. The montage cleverly catches you up on how super heroes came to be and were later outlawed by the Keene Act. The sad end of many of the former costume vigilantes show that as America changed, super heroes became an anachronism. The murder of the Comedian is brutal and leaves you wondering how someone as physically formidable as the Comedian could be killed and who would perpetrate the crime.
The film then goes to Rorschach and shows how his paranoia leads him to uncover a conspiracy to silence not only the Comedian but many of his costumed cohorts. Jackie Earle Haley who played Rorschach was amazing. He didn’t have a single boring moment in the whole film; so much so that I think that a pared down Watchmen focusing just on Rorschach wouldn’t have been a bad thing. His voice and his mannerisms are part sociopath, part hero and dark vigilante. He reminded me a lot of darker side of Batman, someone who’s at the edge of insanity and is capable of superhuman acts because of his willingness to commit unspeakable brutality and his obsessive single-mindedness.
While Rorschach slowly uncovers the pieces to the conspiracy, the film takes the opportunity to explore the pasts of each character. The pasts of the Comedian, Dr. Manhattan, Silk Spectre and Rorschach are revealed. These vignettes were really well done and lend a lot complexity to each character while filling in details how each of them relate the conspiracy at hand. I loved how these were done, and only wish Nite Owl and Ozymandias would’ve been given similar treatment.

Learning about Dr. Manhattan's past was good. Having him in so many of the scenes in the last part of the film, not so much.
However, there were also parts in the movie that just seemed like they were in it to please the legion of fans that read the comic book series. The scenes with Dr. Manhattan and Silk Spectre on Mars for example just seemed tacked on. I didn’t quite understand why Dr. Manhattan would go to Mars and build a huge clock-type contraption and eulogize how much he’s disassociated with human beings. I’m sure there’s a lot of symbolism that I’m missing with that scene, but again, I didn’t read the comic book so I have to judge it by just what I saw in the film.
Also, I wouldn’t have minded if they would’ve cut or significantly trimmed the scenes between Nite Owl and Silk Spectre. While the two of them weren’t bad together, the chemistry between them just didn’t seem to be there. I realize that there’s this huge romantic subplot of Silk Spectre’s romance with Nite Owl and it’s affect on Dr. Manhattan’s decision to abandon humanity. But honestly, I think they could’ve cut all that stuff out. There were plenty of other scenes that showed Dr. Manhattan’s loss of his human perspective. The scene with the Comedian and Dr. Manhattan in Vietnam and the interview where it’s revealed that many of Dr. Manhattan’s friends were dying of cancer would have been plenty by themselves.
So in sum, I liked the film. I didn’t love it, but that’s probably because it was a little too complex and a little bit too long. I do recommend you seeing it, and I think the film will grow on you more on a DVD release where the special features can explain more of the background and perhaps show a different cut of the film.
Related posts:
- New Dragonball movie screens So new promotional stills from Dragonball: Evolution has been...
- Critics bash Street Fighter movie Initial reviews of Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun...
- Watchmen video game spoof Words simply escape me on just how awesome this...
- EVE Online trial reviewed An online game trial should show off enough of...
- Top movie motivation speeches Below are my favorite sci-fi / fantasy themed motivational...

















I kept thinking that the guy who played the Comedian was Javier Bardem (I found out later that it’s actually Jeffrey Dean Morgan), but the two actors definitely look alike
GREAT review!! I felt the exact same way you did in the movie! I haven’t read the book but SO wanted to understand what was going on. After I saw it, I looked on-line and read more about the comics–I then felt like–Hey, If I had read some of this info first, things would have been so much easier to grasp. I feel like the movie was made for people who had read the comics, and if you hadn’t-you might not be able to really “get” the plot or characters correctly. I found myself beings suspicious of Ozy from the beginning. Many of the “heroes” were flawed, and his looks made me think he was bad from the beginning. I also thought the girl who played Spectre was a bad actress(tho I LOVED her outfit!)–and the owl/spectre love thing felt forced-like he was her second choice ONLY because Dr. Manhattan had been so distracted from her. That’s lame! Who wants to be second?!
Anywho- Rorschach was amazing! He NEEDS his own movie! His character was funny(the prison “I’m not locked in here with you, you’re locked in here with me!” quote was my favorite). He was SO developed and the writing for his character was better than any other-it eclipsed them!! I guess he probably dies in the book, but that felt wrong to me in the movie. I mean- I get that he’s paranoid and was treated like crap for so long as a kid that he was suffering and wanted to die–but it felt like a mercy kill when he died. I was confused when it happend–I hate when -what I consider- a main character is killed off in a movie—-and I think he was the most prominent. It didn’t feel like an ensemble cast to me-it was HIS show!
The whole Dr. Manhattan nudity thing was kinda crazy. I HATE censoring, but I hope that they were just being true to the comics with that cuz sometimes he’s in clothes-then a speedo-then nothing. At first I thought he couldn’t “teleport” with clothes on, but then he went to that press conference in a suit. Maybe there’s a whole–He is closer to “perfection” and “God-esque-ness”, so he is unable to be naked or considers it pointless.
My main thing is that the motives weren’t driven home in the movie. I didn’t realize when the “conclusion” and Dr. Manhattan’s taking the blame happend—I guess ur supposed to conclude that the means to make peace was wrong, but the actions were right for each of them.
I was also confused with the old/young heroes co-minglings. The character who got shot in the head—I still don’t know who he was. I think he was a nemesis of someone….
I really liked the movie, but it lacked the essential action of letting the audience in on all the motives and stuff-It was like having a piano player try to explain Mozart’s complexities in the most technical terms-or not at all. The learner doesn’t know all of the lingo, parts-or anything, so only those who speak the lingo, or-in this case- have read the comics- will get it.
…I’m still a little confused.
I’m glad you enjoyed the review, and I also agree with many of the points you made as well.
….wow- I wrote a lot! ….hmmm….